🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a better and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.