🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and revealed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader asserting the sites had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations reopen.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his address to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by military means. He said the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to impose their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and stays the primary solution to settle disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a answer in the same language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this assault."