🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.